Thursday, October 15, 2009

2 samuel

I finished reading 2 samuel just a while ago. While this book has just as much turmoil and strife as the past chapters, I did enjoy much of it. I enjoyed the telling of the interactions of between people and how situations were dealt with. Largely though, this is going to be similar to how I read other great works. I will read it the first time and retain little. The second and third read-throughs will be what really enhances my comprehension.

I have been doing maybe to much thinking lately. The other day I was watching the trya banks show and had to wonder how I stand in the eyes of women. The theme of the show was an apparent cheating gene that men and women may have. I found it hard to believe that people that are known cheaters can have women that want to be with them. I must be in the entirely wrong part of anywhere that I can't get a date or find a woman. I have never cheated or think I could do that to someone. However, known cheaters are willing to go on tv and admit their fallacy with a woman that will go through that.

I also have to wonder about my okcupid habits. I rarely have any women look at my profile. The only ones that do are ones that I have already looked at on my own accord. I think this may be due to some of my own looks. With the quiver feature, I have rejected over 340 women. I have accepted about 50. Most of the ones I have attempted to communicate with don't really seem to be as easy going and interested as they like to say they are. However, most of my rejections have come after only looking at a quick profile and deciding that I am uninterested. I make many rejections based on if the woman has a kid or if they seem overweight. Perhaps many women reject me from whatever basis they have. I have to wonder if I accepted or messaged more often, if I would get more of a response. Should I lower my percieved standards in the hopes of finding someone? Am I ignored because of how much I ignore others on that site? I have to wonder about what some women are expecting on that site. It is not called okfriendmaker, it is called okcupid, in reference to cupid being a bringer of love in the valentine sense.

I have been able to get some generalized feedback about the site. A friend told me that she thinks there is nothing on there. I wasn't sure if that applied to me or not, but from a known perspective the site is lacking in quality men. This doesn't seem to do me any favors, so I must really be low on any ranking.

times typed "oftern"-0

No comments:

Post a Comment